AS: This looks like new work?
BB: These are a set of paintings where I
found a new staining process. I’ve been making up canvases ready for paintings
and I’m going to stain them in different ways. I cover the surface in paint and
then I stand it on an easel with loads of tissue underneath and run stuff down.
AS: Is it oil paint?
BB: Yes, and because it’s white spirit and
not turpentine, it splits like this. I have no idea what they’re about any more
than what they are.
AS: The borders are interesting.
BB: I have been doing that a lot. It seems
to lift the space. When you make a painting you start with nothing and
sometimes the underpainting is really beautiful and then it goes up and down in
waves. You try to leave the painting at that point where it hits the crest of
the wave before it drops and you have to make it into something else. It goes
from a fresh painting into something laboured, but more beautiful. You have to
go through that process. If you can get within say 20 percent of the top you
just stop because you know you can get it closer but you let the work go. So with
some of these paintings there is just the stain of the original canvas and sometimes
there are marks that keep being worked. Those pieces are often simple in the
end but there is so much underneath that makes it something new. I was trying
to stop early every time and I started thinking that I could do all of them
really light, but in a set of things only two or three might work, and the rest
don’t, so you take those further.
The Lonely Chorister, 2013, oil on acrylic panel, 25x30cm |
AS:
Have you moved away from the polyhedron-in-landscape paintings?
BB:
I reached a point where there was no energy to keep making the
landscapes and they were becoming too similar. I like the idea that when I am
50 years old, I could paint whatever I want and so I decided to try it, as an
experiment, and in a way it was damaging because when I started making these
looser paintings, I couldn’t be bothered to make the polyhedron paintings any
more because they are so laboured and these are so quick. I like the freshness
of the newer works, but again, a similar thing started to happen. Because they
were so quick and fresh and fast I would make lots but there was no investment.
So they’re opposites.
Doughnut Head, 2013, oil on plywood, 20x15cm |
AS: Completely different ways of making?
BB: The later paintings were all wet into
wet, all one layer, very fast, rubbing bits out and painting them back. These
first ones are very representational and I found this tedious. They might be a
millimetre off on one side and then they just don’t work. What I discovered
with the portraits, which I like, is that once you get the eyes, nostrils and mouth
the right size, and the general position on the head, it just works and you can
reduce and reduce and just have those pinpoints. So I trace the image on using
those pinpoints and work from that. Because it has that structure and you can
read faces so easily they just came together. In many ways it was about finding
different ways of pushing the paint around, but having a structure to draw it
all together.
Major Mellon, 2013, oil on board, 22x15cm |
AS: When you’re making a tight, specific
painting, I imagine that you have a good idea how it will turn out. Was it a
surprise to do something much freer?
BB: Definitely. In the polyhedron
paintings, the composition was pre-determined by Photoshop with lots of layers,
choosing even where the shadows would fall. The thing I enjoy so much about
painting those is that the colour ranges would change so much and just become
so different and that became a responsive element. But I started to feel that
the way I applied the paint was quite stiff. It didn’t say anything about the
way paint is. When I started the
portraits, I couldn’t tell where they were going. That was the beauty. There
was room for that sort of experimentation, even with a structure and a guide. A
lot of them are of my boy. He works really well for this because he was so tiny
and the proportions of his face were huge. The paintings of adults are often
much leaner so they become slightly quirky characters. Then, for example, for Major
Melon, I started finding images online that had a particular feel to them.
Floatstickle, 2012, oil on acrylic panel, 25x30cm |
AS: Were you looking for something quite
specific in the images?
BB: Yes, but not something I could necessarily
pin down. I have a very clear idea about what it is and why it interests me but
there are a lot of things that I am painting at the moment. I look at something
and it will seem really important. At University I had been reading books about
the sublime and Edmund Burke, who was a contemporary of Kant, who wrote about
the sublime being a dangerous immense presence that you’re able to be in awe of
at a safe enough distance. At the same time, I discovered photos of volcanic
islands forming near Tonga and I realised that when you see an explosion, it
fits those criteria. If you think about how the world has changed over the last
20 years, particularly since 9/11, our worldview has changed and it’s down to those
images. But I like the erupting volcano images because there is no malice in
them. And there is a sense of them being an incredible force but it’s not about
destruction, it is actually about creation. I have that kind of element when
I’m working on those. I have that very clearly in my mind. Some artists make the same thing, over
and over, and there are subtle differences but they choose a narrow field. I
know why people do it, it’s being specific and homing in on one thing but it
seems so strange to me that that idea remains prevalent. It seems to be such a
modernist idea of the artist genius that has one vision which has to be
revealed, particularly when people are so varied with what they do and their
interests.
She Waited for a Lifetime, 2013, oil on acrylic panel, 16x20cm |
AS: As well as the varied subject matter,
there is a mixture of painting styles with the softer gestural ground and the graphic,
hard line.
BB: One of the things I wanted to do with
the new polyhedron paintings is just use one brush mark, wiped off, and then
the polyhedron goes on top. They’re super delicate. You can scratch them with
your nail, and they don’t work bigger than on really quite a small scale
because you have to apply the paint so thin or it could peel off because it’s
on Perspex. A lot of the finish on
these is a super mat varnish. It makes a huge difference. It brings everything
together, particularly the blacks which are very carbon and dry. I use lamp
black rather than ivory because it’s more consistent. And I like the completely
flat finish.
AS: How do you get the surface so smooth?
BB: I just use very soft square brushes and
build up the layers. That sky has got about 10 or 15 layers on it, which is why
I was getting frustrated and ended up doing 20 minute portraits. I realised
recently that I just need a mix. It really helps. I like making and sometimes
if I’ve got the energy or drive to do it, I can work on something slower. This
is one of the first ones that I did. A real sci-fi moment. I like this one
because it is all imagined. None of it is from anything. I take a lot of photos
when I’m away. My family think they’re not very interesting but that’s the
point. I find a landscape where I think something is missing and I put my
polyhedron where the thing is missing. That’s what I’m often looking for, that
gap. This is Scafell Pike, that one is in the Alps.
AS: Are you a walker?
Base Camp, 2013, oil on canvas over board, 20cm
Rowan Day, 2013, oil on canvas over board, 25cm
Benjamin Bridges' exhibition Pythagoras Adrift opens at dalla Rosa Gallery, 121 Clerkenwell Road, London EC1R 5BY on 14 March - 12 April 2014
Private View: Thursday, 13 March, 6.30-8.30pm
www.benjaminbridges.com
www.dallarosagallery.com
Benjamin Bridges' exhibition Pythagoras Adrift opens at dalla Rosa Gallery, 121 Clerkenwell Road, London EC1R 5BY on 14 March - 12 April 2014
Private View: Thursday, 13 March, 6.30-8.30pm
www.benjaminbridges.com
www.dallarosagallery.com